Skip to Content
M&A and Corporate Governance Litigation

Filters
  • Delaware Court Of Chancery Dismisses Stockholder Derivative Suit, Rejecting “Eleventh Hour” Section 220 Demand Tolling Theory
    08/04/2026
    On July 9, 2026, Vice Chancellor Lori W. Will of the Delaware Court of Chancery dismissed a stockholder derivative action against a biopharmaceutical company (the “Company”), as the nominal defendant, and several of its current and former officers and directors.  In re Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. S’holder Deriv. Litig., Consol. C.A. No. 2025-1076-LWW (Del. Ch. July 9, 2026).  The Court rejected plaintiffs’ argument that a Section 220 demand necessarily tolls the statute of limitations and held that plaintiffs’ breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, and waste claims were barred by laches because they were filed after the three-year limitations period expired.  The Court explained: “A diligently pursued books and records suit may, in appropriate circumstances, justify equitable tolling.  But an eleventh-hour, out-of-court demand pursued with little zeal does not.”